Transcript: Jake Lancaster Podcast
Jake Lancaster speaks to managing editor Emily Everett about his story “Grace’s Folly,” which appears in The Common’s most recent issue. Jake talks about writing stories that lean into the offbeat, uncomfortable, and sometimes grotesque parts of his characters and their lives. He also discusses his writing and revision process—carving away at long first drafts until all that’s left is essential—and his work teaching writing at the University of Minnesota.
Translated from the Arabic by LILY SADOWSKY
Piece appears below in both English and Arabic.
Translator’s Note
In “James Joyce” (1982), a stifled writer engages a hallucinatory Joyce in dialogue about writing, and in so doing, interrogates not only what—but also who—makes a great writer. Combining his trademark intertextuality with tense mixing and pronoun ambiguity, Zafzaf creates a haze of temporal unease. But however lost in time our writer is, he is distinctly aware of his place. Creative mastery is never simply a matter of skill but always also a question of positionality and circumstance. The freedom to be authentic or make new, to mean or will, is not equally free for all. Time is unstable; remembrance, unbalanced.
*
Ama Codjoe is the author of Bluest Nude (Milkweed Editions, 2022) and Blood of the Air (Northwestern University Press, 2020), winner of the Drinking Gourd Chapbook Poetry Prize. Her recent poems have appeared in The Nation, The Atlantic, The Best American Poetry series, and elsewhere. Among other honors, she has received a Rona Jaffe Foundation Writer’s Award, a Creative Writing Fellowship from the National Endowment for the Arts, a NYSCA/NYFA Artist Fellowship, and a Jerome Hill Artist Fellowship. She lives in New York City.
Table of Contents:
The ethos of the modern world is defined by immigrants. Their stories have always been an essential component of our cultural consciousness, from Isaac Bashevis Singer to Isabel Allende, from Milan Kundera to Yiyun Li. In novels, short stories, memoirs, and works of journalism, immigrants have shown us what resilience and dedication we’re capable of, and have expanded our sense of what it means to be global citizens. In these times of intense xenophobia, it is more important than ever that these boundary-crossing stories reach the broadest possible audience.
Curated by SOFIA BELIMOVA
For our September round of Friday Reads, we spoke to two TC contributors, who recommended vibrant prose that leaps off the page and compelling poetry that transcends linguistic barriers while echoing with the sound of home.
Please join us in welcoming back contributor DAVID LEHMAN. This is the title poem of his new collection, The Morning Line.
The Morning Line
— May 22, 2020
1.
You can pick horses on the basis of their names
and gloat when Justify wins racing’s Triple Crown
or when, in 1975, crowd favorite Ruffian, “queen
of the century,” goes undefeated until she breaks down
in a match race with Derby winner Foolish Pleasure.
Who could root against Ruffian?
Did patriotic Englishmen cheer
when Sir Winston won the Belmont last year?
I rejoiced when Monarchos, a ten to one bet, became
the second horse ever to break the two-minute mark
at the Kentucky Derby. Why did I pick it? I liked the name.
Those two minutes in May 2001 and the giddy hours after
now seem a little like a garden party in England in July 1914
as the nineteenth century approached the finish line
and collapsed.
Today you might buy 50 shares of Qualcom at 78.11,
or 500 shares of Sirius at 5.15,
because you like the sound of their names,
and you may make these trades even without knowing
a thing about what the companies produce or do.
As luck would have it, under current market conditions,
a portfolio consisting of these two stocks plus Alphabet,
Amazon, and Apple would satisfy our poetry criterion
and stand a decent chance of outperforming the market,
as would a portfolio consisting of attractive stock symbols
like ACES, CAT, KO, NICE, QQQ, SPY, TAN, and TOKE.
“Under current market conditions.” There’s the rub.
If current, market, and conditions are variables,
chance determines the outcome, as in abstract art.
There will be an epidemic, an earthquake, a hurricane;
these will take place, but you can’t say where or when,
and the same goes for a cyber-attack crippling the electric grid,
a terrorist outrage in a tunnel or bridge, the meltdown
of a nuclear power plant, or even a rebellion of angry birds
menacing the human population of a northern California town.
What if the stars should take a powder? Can’t happen?
You never know. “If the Sun and Moon should ever doubt,
they’d immediately go out,” wrote William Blake.
The if is even more important than the doubt.
If you can conceive it, it can be done. Scoff all you like.
If history has taught us anything, it’s that you can kill anyone,
and Ladbroke’s of London will lay the odds.
Acts of God (if you’re a traditionalist)
or black swan events (if you’re a secular humanist)
cannot be predicted. The blather of experts
will do you little good, because
the unknowns are in flux, and the gulf
is sometimes wide between the odds
set by the handicapper for the morning line
and the betting public at the track
when the horses reach the starting gate.
Nevertheless, though playing the ponies has declined
as a pastime, though market crashes
have spooked retail investors, and though
everyone knows the odds are stacked
in favor of the house, people will continue to bet,
and bet big, on races and contests, cards and dice,
games and turns of the wheel, stocks and bonds,
options, rates of exchange, orange juice futures,
elections, murders per capita, jobless claims ,
the number of crates of disinfecting wipes
Clorox has shipped since March 15, 2020
or the number of current ad campaigns
in which part of the pitch is “we’re in this together.”
At the moment I have a side bet on “never bet
against America,” a phrase that has caught on
since Warren Buffett used it at Berkshire Hathaway’s
virtual annual meeting. The phrase frames the crisis
of the day as a wager about who will prevail when
Affirmed and Alydar go head to head for a fourth showdown
or when the Celtics of Larry Bird square off one more time
against the Lakers of Magic Johnson.
The Derby and Preakness won’t be run until the fall this year,
and they won’t be playing the NBA finals in June.
People will miss the games, but they will bet on much else
with cash, or play money, or just in that realm
of the imagination that prefigures the things we do.
2.
Gambling is a natural human instinct, because life
is a gamble in which you will lose your shirt
or draw a third ace to fill a full house
on days equally rare. “Life,” Baudelaire wrote,
“has but one true charm: the charm
of gambling.” All beliefs are bets,
though a bet is not necessarily a gamble.
If the lockdown goes into a third month,
and we get a heat wave, and beaches are closed,
and there’s no sports betting, it’s a safe bet
there will be rioting in the cities
and a big spike in day trading. You can also bet
on the persistence of prejudice, political bickering,
fakery, hypocrisy, bureaucracy, and the power of the lie,
but no one will take the bet, and it’s not a gamble.
You need a degree of recklessness to be a gambler.
Religion is risky, a big gamble,
though not in the way Pascal proposed
and Voltaire refuted. Pascal’s wager is not,
as he tries to sell it, a real gamble.
He would subject a belief in God
to a cost / benefit analysis.
If you bet on God and God exists you win;
if you bet against and you lose, you lose big.
The argument is seductive, but the proposition
has lost all conviction. The risk has been drained from it.
If only self-interest could furnish the grounds for belief!
You might also say that the ends (divinity) stand
in diametric opposition to the means (logic)
in Pascal’s equation, which remains, despite
its flaws, a fascinating subject of contemplation,
like the bust of Homer in Aristotle’s hands.
“God is a scandal – a scandal which pays,”
Baudelaire wrote in his “squibs” (trans. Christopher Isherwood).
“God is the sole being who has no need to exist in order to reign.”
Gambling requires faith, not assurance or certitude
but something finer, rarer: faith, a near rhyme
of truth and death that sounds like fate,
which is how Willem de Kooning pronounced the word.
And what is faith but the opposite of doubt – a force
to press back against the dismal news of the day,
the doubt that arises in the mind of the prophet
beholding the wickedness of the people?
Religion requires risk, like the risk you feel
when you are so deeply involved with another person
that you cannot imagine living your life without her.
The inevitability of loss, a much-misunderstood aspect
of gambling, is not a deterrent but an attraction.
The experience of loss is as potent a stimulant
as the experience of jumping from a low-flying plane
trusting your parachute will work.
3.
A compulsive gambler’s habit is as hard to break
as smoking or drinking, maybe harder. The gambler
believes in the god of chance, which is the wrong god
to believe in. Gamblers act on superstition just as athletes do:
wear a shirt with red in it every Sunday; on a winning streak,
use the same bat, do not shave, eat the same breakfast
every day; change your stance in a slump, though you know
nothing will help in a slump. Skillful poker players
put a game face on a nasty turn of events,
but they do that when the cards favor them, too.
Skill or luck: “People think mastering the skill
is the hard part, but they’re wrong. The trick to poker
is mastering the luck” (James McManus).
To the writer, all is raw material, bad luck or good.
A novelist friend developed a system of winning at roulette,
but it did him more good as the backdrop for a story
than in practice in Monte Carlo.
The philosophical gambler takes the path
of the melancholy pickpocket in a 1950s French movie.
To him, if I may speak of myself this way, luck is a muse,
and Frank Loesser’s song “Luck, Be a Lady”
communicates the risk taker’s situation. The phrases
he likes have two or even three separate meanings, which
he must conjoin, so that Stendhal’s The Red and the Black
is read in the context of the red and black boxes
on a roulette-wheel carpet – or the red and black squares
of the chess board in a match pitting the Russian grandmaster
against the American upstart – and the morning line signifies
not only the bookmaker’s calculations, but also
a verse to speak when the bell tolls for thee.
David Lehman‘s recent books are One Hundred Autobiographies: A Memoir (Cornell University Press, 2019) and Playlist: A Poem (Pittsburgh). He is the editor of The Oxford Book of American Poetry and series editor of The Best American Poetry. He has written nonfiction books about the New York School of poets, classic American popular songs, Frank Sinatra, and mystery novels, among other subjects.
Celeste Mohammed speaks to managing editor Emily Everett about her story “Home,” which appears in The Common’s spring issue. In this conversation, Celeste talks about her novel-in-stories, Pleasantview, and why it was important to her to write a book that shows all the complexities and difficulties of island life, with characters who break out of the stereotypical West Indian personality Americans often expect. She also discusses Trinidad’s multicultural society, her choice to write dialogue in patois, and her essay “Split Me in Two,” about being mixed-race during the election of Vice President Kamala Harris.
SASHA BURSHTEYN interviews SARA ELKAMEL
Poet and journalist Sara Elkamel is currently pursuing an MFA at New York University, dividing her time between Cairo and New York City. Her work can be found in several literary magazines including the Los Angeles Review and Michigan Quarterly Review. Her most recent work is a chapbook, Field of No Justice, published as part of Akashic Books’ African Poetry Book Fund.
Curated by ELLY HONG
For our September round of Friday Reads, we spoke to two recent online contributors: Kaori Fujimoto, author of the dispatch “Shinjuku Golden Gai and the Midnight Diner,” and Sophie Crocker, author of the story “Lyuba Boys.” Their recommendations both speak to the power of language; an American author journeys toward writing in Italian, and a new collection of poems challenges English as a weapon of colonialism.
Recommendations: In Other Words by Jhumpa Lahiri and Pilgrim Bell by Kaveh Akbar
Don’t miss an issue! Subscribe to The Common.
